Burrows seeking federal Liberal nomination
- Number of views : 591
- Rate
- Top of the page
Comments
-
- Chicki
- - January 18th, 2010 at 11:16:38
Mr Burrows will be tough to beat and when he gets the nod maybe considered the front runner. In the Ag community alone he's known right across NS. Just ask the Bacons, Fage, Scott, Muir, Taylor etc
-
- Robert
- - January 18th, 2010 at 10:43:11
Who cares who the Lib candidate is Moriarty? This isn't provincial politics. This is federal. People voted for the NDP because they liked what Dexter had to say. Jack Layton is a whole other ballgame. He is NOT Dexter and most people know that. mustache Jack hasn't a hope in Hades of winning in Ottawa. Most ridings who vote NDP provincially usually don't vote the same federally and for good reason. To put an NDP incumbant in Ottawa as our MP would be political suicide. We'd suffer even more than simply having an opposition member represent us.
-
- Moriarty
- - January 18th, 2010 at 10:34:56
The Liberal candidate?? Who cares?
I wanna know who the NDP are nominating, this is going to be their race to lose. -
- Moriarty
- - January 18th, 2010 at 10:33:05
Well, Robert all I can say to that is take a look at the numbers in Cumberland North (provincially) in 2006 and 2009.
Then look at last years CCMV numbers.
I think you'll notice that the margin of victory for Fage and Casey is relatively the same. You'll also notice that the 2006 NDP provincial support is about 15% in Cumberland North...which is the same as the 2008 federal support in CCMV.
Both NDP campaigns (Kim Cail provincial in 2006 and Karen Olsson Federal in 2008) did not have nearly the same amount of volunteers/excitment/organization as Skabar, Zann or Burrill's campaigns.
The NDP is ready for a fight, and ready to mount a real campaign.
This caught the traditional parties off guard in all 5 ridings that make up CCMV in the provinvial election. And will catch them off guard again this time.
If not an NDP victory, I think we're looking at least a doubling of their support with the Libs holding down third place as they did last time.
It really has nothing to do with Jack, in fact I think you'll see him stay out of the maritimes as much as he can. It has to do with the NDP's core support of about 15% without running an agressive campaign, and the impact an active campaign can have.
My prediction, Tory win at about 40%, NDP second with roughly 35% with the Libs in 3rd.
Of course, there is always the *X-Factor*...Elizabeth May. *shudder* -
- Robert
- - January 18th, 2010 at 10:31:13
While I admire the fact that you were able to produce numbers for your argument I have to disagree on the basis that most folks will see that the Provincial NDP and the Federal NDP are two entirely different entities with entirely different agendas.
Darrel Dexter's NDP are a *slightly left of center* party while Jacks NDP are so far left they're barely on the same field as the rest of us. Darrel seems to know how to balance social attitudes with fiscal responsibility (I really, really hope he does anyhow) whereas Jack (and his cronies) barely have a grip on reality.
Until all the cards are on the table I've ceased attacking Dexter. That isn't going to happen with the Federal NDP. They've proven time and again that they have no concept of reality and the vast majority of voters can see right through them. Any NDP incumbent to run in this riding will only be to ensure they get enough candidates to maximize their budget slice... not actually to win. Due to this, and the fact most folks can't stand the sound of Harper's name, I think Burrows stands a good chance should he run.



